Guan Eng wants SDO to explain arches fiasco

While the embattled state development officer (SDO) Nik Ali Mat Yunos was fuming at a press conference held by Umno over Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng’s unflattering remarks about him, the latter was finding more fault with him.

Lim, who visited the Penang Botanical Gardens yesterday, where two controversial arches remain an eyesore, charged that Nik Ali, who is a federal government appointee, was “openly and blatantly” sabotaging the state government.

“He is like a little Napoleon in the civil service who gets high pay and does nothing for the people, but instead causes losses to them,” Lim told reporters during his visit.

Lim wants Nik Ali to come clean about the RM150,000 plus losses over the planned demolition of the two twin arches recently built for an expansion project under the Tourism Ministry.

He holds Nik Ali responsible as he was the “controlling officer in charge of overseeing the project”.

The arches, one of which is tilting, have been criticised by Penangites and tourists who said these have no cultural or aesthetic value.

Following an overwhelming outcry in a poll conducted by the Tourism Ministry, minister Ng Yen Yen ordered that these should be demolished.

Lim has taken offence with Nik Ali for refusing to explain who – which department, state or federal government – was responsible for the staggering losses.

“If he is willing to tell us that, we will not pursue the matter. Every sen counts, because it is a question of public trust,” Lim added.

RM5 million ultimatum

Lim has also seen red over a letter sent by the SDO’s office dated Oct 13, 2009 to the Drainage and Irrigation Department, giving a “RM5 million ultimatum” to the state.

The letter states that the state would have to settle “pending issues” on the Botanic Gardens’ facade and pavilion development, failing which, federal funding of RM5 million for the project would be withdrawn.

“This is an example of how the SDO’s office is trying to rush development projects through without due consultation and feedback,” said Lim (left).

Since then, Lim is alleged to have taken Nik Ali to task over several issues including the official opening of the Penang Hill Railway, where the latter was accused of not providing a seat for the CM.

Recently, Lim slammed Nik Ali for allegedly causing a rift between him and Pulau Betong assemblyperson Muhamad Faris Saad, who raised the issue of sand theft at a plot in Kampung Kenanga which had been earmarked for a government polytechnic college.

The SDO has responded angrily by calling Lim ‘biadap’ (rude), saying the latter has no locus standi to evaluate his work.

MalaysiaKini - Susan Loone – Jul 20, 10
http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/137809

VN:F [1.9.17_1161]
Rating: +3 (from 3 votes)
Be Sociable, Share!

Artikel lain yang berkaitan|其他相关报道|Other relevant posts

  1. 冠英:许子根是应声虫 质疑袒护聂阿里动机
  2. Ketua Menteri: Putrajaya lindungi ‘Little Napoleon’
  3. 否认不满被冷落才攻击聂阿里 冠英交律师研究报章破坏名誉
  4. Statement from Press Secretary to CM : Letter to Bernama
  5. 槟州首席部长新闻秘书致马新社的一封信
  6. 许子根丁福南难改要讨好巫统领袖的本性!
  7. 民联若续执政 净化槟榔河到第2级
  8. 浮罗工艺学院遭偷沙却未围墙 冠英讥中央怪罪州政府
  9. 图推倒槟政府? 首长炮轰政府首席秘书力挺聂阿里
  10. DAP may take SDO to court
  11. 斥聂阿里违反宪法公务员守则 州政府下逐客令要他调离槟州
  12. PAC siasat kes curi pasir di Balik Pulau
  13. 槟公账会宣布介入调查偷砂案 发展官轰冠英辱骂公仆失身份
  14. 林冠英促聂阿里辞公务员参政 针对“小拿破仑”并非敌视公仆
  15. Guan Eng wants SDO to explain arches fiasco (This post)
  16. KM arah SDO jelas gerbang kontroversi
  17. 林冠英续炮轰聂阿里 联邦无能官员“象征”

2 Responses to “Guan Eng wants SDO to explain arches fiasco”

  1. Honestjohn says:

    That’s why we are behind the DAP,CM LGE …Please remove all these people from our beloved Penang tate!Remember CAT.

    VA:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  2. tan seang aun says:

    Sorry to say there are still many “Little Napoleon” in state agencies which mislead the current state administrators, I have written to that individuals in high positions to ‘bertaubat’ if not we will expose their wrong doings if they still try to sabotage the present Penang State government.

    VA:F [1.9.17_1161]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Leave a Response