JUSTICE for Beng Hock! 莫让明福 死不瞑目! Chua Soi Lek Should Not Follow Utusan Malaysia’s Tactics Of Racialising The Results Of The Sarawak General Elections 5 Core Principles Of Middle Malaysia How Much Has The Federal Government Allocated For Penang Under the 10th Malaysian Plan? BN’s Narrow-Mindedness to Claim Credit for Penang’s Investment Success DAP Leaders Must Be Careful Kalau stadium boleh runtuh, apa lagi loji nuklear? 当槟绿色公民 遵10生活准则 蔡细历不要再做戏了! Chua Soi Lek Labelled As Crazy By His Own MCA Branch In Penang DAP tangguh pemilihan parti hingga Ogos 2012 Jangan Kita Mempertikaikan Masa Depan Anak-anak Kita 丁福南逃避对陈合裕案件应负的责任 槟州政府津贴筹办 托儿月费50元 槟州民主行动党大选备战指挥中心招募超级讲师!

Federal Court: MACC can interrogate witnesses after office hours

The Federal Court today declared that witnesses can be interrogated by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) beyond office hours.

The three judges, Abdull Hamid Embong, Mohd Ghazali Mohd Yusoff and Heliliah Mohd Yusof, came up with the unanimous decision after spending about 35 minutes in the chambers.

However, they did not give the grounds of their judgement, saying that they will deliver it “later”.

They also unanimously awarded the cost incurred in the Court of Appeal and Federal Court, a total of RM30,000, to the MACC.

Senior federal counsel for MACC Amarjeet Singh, in his submission, maintained that the Court of Appeal’s judgement, which had said that restricting the time of examination to normal office hours would create absurdity, and would not promote the purpose of the MACC Act.

“The importance of prompt and unimpeded investigation would promote the purpose of the Act.

“The apex court has always recognized the importance of investigation as not only as being in the interest of the public, but also in the interest of justice even when the fundamental rights of an individual is at issue,” he told the court in Putrajaya this morning.

He also said that the provision in the act, sections 30(1)(a) and 30(3)(a) confers a power on the officer investigating an offence to require the attendance of any person to assist in investigations.

“This provision is in line with promoting the purpose of preventing corruption by ensuring that the time of investigation is not restricted and takes place as and when the occasion requires,” he said.

“Time to carry out investigative functions ,therefore, cannot beinterpreted as being restricted to normal working hours.”

‘Suspects have more rights than witnesses’

However, Tan’s lawyer, Karpal Singh, told the court that had the legislature intended for the term “day-to-day” when providing for interrogation of witnesses to mean continuously or without interruption from one 24 -hour day to another, it is only proper to look for some other meaning of the word or phrase.

The veteran lawyer also cited the Lock-up Rules, which protect suspects from further interrogation between 6.30pm and 6.30am.

“Witnesses should be entitled to more protection than suspects. It is the reliable evidence of witnesses which ultimately succeed in the conviction of suspects.

“If witnesses were questioned round the clock, their statements should then be inadmissible,” he said.

When met outside the court, Karpal expressed disappointment.

“Now suspects have more rights than witnesses,” he said, adding that there will be repercussions as witnesses will be afraid to come forward.

End of the road

He also said that it is already the end of the road for Tan as there will be no more room for review of the Federal Court decision.

Tan, had challenged the MACC’s right to interrogate witnesses late at night, during which time the commission has been accused of torturing them.

Tan himself was questioned overnight at the Selangor MACC headquarters in Shah Alam on July 15 last year, together with state exco Ean Yong Hian Wah’s aide Teoh Beng Hock. Teoh was subsequently found dead the next morning.

The High Court had ruled in favour of Tan, allowing the judicial review, saying that the MACC is not empowered to investigate a witness “round the clock”.

But the decision was overturned by the Court of Appeal on Dec 17, which held that restricting the interrogation of witnesses to working hours would create an absurdity and would not promote the purpose of the MACC Act.

The judges also decided to award costs to the MACC in the civil suit filed by Kajang municipal councillor Tan Boon Wah (photo, left).

The judges also did not give their grounds, saying that they will on do so “in due course”.

MalaysiaKini - Regina Lee – May 20, 10
http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/132257

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Leave a Response